|
Table of Contents
Terms Used In This Article
brainstem - base of the brain which connects to the spinal cord and
controls basic functions such as breathing and heart rate
conus - cone shaped
area at the lower end of the spinal cord
filum terminale -
fibrous thread that connects the lower end of the spinal cord to the bony
spinal column
foramen magnum - opening in the base of the skull through which the
brain and spine connect
lumbar - one of the
sections of the spine, the lower back region
morphometric - in this article, refers to measuring dimensions of the
skull and brain
occult - a disease or
problem that is not readily apparent; in other words can not be seen on
images
posterior fossa -region in the back of the skull where the cerebellum
is situated section - to cut
spina bifida - birth
defect where the neural tube does not close properly
tethered cord syndrome (TCS)
- condition where the spinal cord is improperly attached, or tethered,
to the spine
spinal cord - bundle
of nerve fibers that runs from the base of the brain all the way down the
back, through the bony spine
Common Chiari Terms cerebellar tonsils -
portion of the cerebellum located at the bottom, so named because of their
shape
cerebellum - part of
the brain located at the bottom of the skull, near the opening to the spinal
area; important for muscle control, movement, and balance
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) - clear liquid in the brain and spinal
cord, acts as a shock absorber
Chiari malformation I -
condition where the cerebellar tonsils are displaced out of the skull area
into the spinal area, causing compression of brain tissue and disruption of
CSF flow
decompression surgery -
general term used for any of several surgical techniques employed to
create more space around a Chiari malformation and to relieve compression
syringomyelia -
condition where a fluid filled cyst forms in the spinal cord
|
July 31st, 2009 -- Tethered Cord Syndrome (TCS) is a condition
where the spinal cord tissue attaches abnormally to the bones of the spine.
The resulting tension causes symptoms such as bladder and bowel incontinence
and weakness of the legs. Sometimes skin abnormalities develop over
the attachment point, and can be a clue to the underlying problem. TCS
is usually treated surgically by "freeing" the cord. Success of the
surgery is mixed with many patients experiencing relief from some symptoms
but not others.
TCS can be due to a number of different factors, such
as spina bifida or fatty deposits, but recently much attention has been paid
to the role that the filum terminale plays in tethered cord. The filum
terminale is a fibrous thread which connects the very bottom of the spinal
cord to the coccyx bone. If the filum terminale is unusually thick, or
tight, it can essentially place the spinal cord in traction and pull it
down. For children, as their spinal cords grow, they will be pulling
up on an anchor that is too strong.
Because the cord is mechanically pulled down, TCS can
often be seen on an MRI, which shows that the conus - a lower section of the
spinal cord - is abnormally low relative to the bony vertebra.
Specifically, the conus is usually located at the L1/L2 level, and MRI
evidence that it is lower than this is a strong indication of tethered cord.
If a cord is tethered due to the filum terminale, the surgery to correct it
is fairly simple; the filum terminale is cut, or sectioned, and the tension
on the cord is released.
While the traditional diagnosis of TCS relies on
imaging evidence, beginning in 1990, some physicians began to speculate that
a subset of patients might be suffering from tethered cords which do not
show up on MRI's. Referred to as occult tethered cord, the theory is
that even though the conus is at the normal level, the filum terminale is
abnormally fatty, thick, or tight, and thus puts the cord under tension.
These physicians began to section the filum terminale based on symptoms -
such as intractable urinary incontinence - rather than MRI results.
Naturally, since the surgeons were basing their
decisions mostly on their own judgment, controversy began to grow over this
practice. Conservative surgeons pointed out that there was no clear
evidence that these patients had tethered cords and that the risks of
surgery were not warranted. More aggressive surgeons pointed to their
own track record of success in improving patients' symptoms with the
relatively simple surgery.
In addition to confusion surrounding whether occult
tethered cord is a true clinical condition, the relationship between occult
tethered cord and Chiari is not clear. Given the downward pull of a
tight filum, some have proposed that tethered cord syndrome can lead to
Chiari. However this view is not widely accepted. Indeed, there
is evidence to support both sides of the argument. Ellenbogen
documented, via MRI, a child with a clearly fatty and tight filum, who then
developed Chiari over time. Although this is compelling, an MRI alone
does not mean that the tight filum actually caused the tonsils to herniate.
On the flip side, Tubbs found, through a cadaver study, that tension applied
to the bottom of the spinal cord dissipates very quickly as you move up the
spine, and thus is unlikely to affect the brain. However, Tubbs also
found, in a different study, that an unusually high percentage of people
with lipomyelomeningocele also have Chiari.
Recently, the controversy over tethered cord and Chiari spilled into the national media and even the legal system, with a number
of high profile lawsuits against the Chiari Institute (TCI) and their use of
tethered cord surgery. While this publication, and Conquer Chiari,
takes no position in terms of the relative merits of any of these claims,
TCI recently published their preliminary findings on tethered cord and
Chiari in the journal, Surgical Neurology. This provides an
opportunity to look at the data they have collected outside of the
media/legal spotlight, in a dispassionate manner.
TCI has a patient base unlike any other in the
Chiari community and for this study looked at more than 3,000 children and
adults seen between 2002 - 2007. They classified each person as having
Chiari based on the strict definition of at least 5mm of herniation, or as
having low lying tonsils (LLT) if the herniation was less than 5 mm.
To identify tethered cord syndrome, the researchers
looked for classic TCS symptoms, such as bowel/bladder issues, low back pain
etc., and also laid out a set of tests, of which at least 5 had to be
positive to qualify as TCS. Examples of such tests included the
presence of neurogenic bladder, symptom relief on a toe walk test, and
symptom aggravation on a heel walk test. In addition, detailed
morphometric studies were performed, looking at both skull and brain
dimensions.
Using the established criteria, they found that a
relatively small number of the Chiari group (14%) had indications of TCS,
but a majority of the low lying tonsil group (63%) qualified as having TCS.
It is important to keep in mind that it is difficult to apply these findings
to the general Chiari population because TCI tends to attract more difficult
cases. In fact, of the entire study population, nearly half had had at
least one previous failed surgery.
Regardless, in addition, they found significant
anatomical differences between those classified as having TCS and those with
traditional Chiari. Specifically, to no one's surprise, those with
traditional Chiari were found to have small posterior fossas compared to
healthy controls. However, this was not true for the TCS group,
meaning that their skulls were similar in size to healthy controls.
The researchers did find, however, that the TCS group, on average, had
elongated brainstems, wider foramen magnums, and downward displacement of
the hindbrain.
Out of the TCS group, 74 children and 244 adults
underwent sectioning of the filum terminale with generally favorable results
(Table 2). Although only a small group had complete resolution of their
symptoms, overall 93% of children and 83% of adults did improve after
surgery. Follow-up imaging showed that in many cases the conus moved
up after surgery, indicating the spine was being pulled down. In
addition, they found that the brainstem shortened and the cerebellar tonsils
moved up. Interestingly, every patient with a positive surgical
outcome had an elongated brainstem prior to surgery.
The authors readily admit that it is not clear why if
the filum is putting traction on the spine sufficient to pull down the brain
that the bottom part of the spine, the conus, would be in a normal position. But they do point
out that since the conus consistently moved up after surgery, that it is
likely it was under traction.
The authors further point out that the best way to
treat patients with Chiari and indications of TCS is still to be determined.
Based on their experiences to date, they only section the filum if there is
evidence of brainstem elongation and other indications the brain is being
pulled down. Further, if there is a large herniation, they first
perform a posterior fossa decompression before considering TCS surgery.
It is important to note that the TCI publication contains a
good deal more data, for example involving syrinxes and scoliosis. Due
to space limitations, it is recommended that the interested reader go
directly to the publication (see Source) for more details.
The occult TCS controversy, especially as it relates to
Chiari, is likely to continue for some time. One way to address the
issue head on would be to develop a non-invasive technique to measure the
tension of the filum in these types of patients to see if they are indeed
pulling down on the spine.
-- Rick Labuda
Back to Table of Contents |
Key Points
-
Occult tethered cord and TCS surgery are controversial
topics in their relationship to Chiari
-
Large study from TCI used symptoms to identify TCS among
patients with Chiari and low lying tonsils
-
Found that 63% of patients with low lying tonsils had
indications of TCS
-
Found that those identified as TCS did NOT have small
posterior fossas, as opposed to classic Chiari
-
TCS patients did tend to have elongated brainstems and wider
foramen magnums
-
Performed section of the filum terminale in more than 300
patients
-
Overall 93% of children improved and 83% of adults improved
-
Every patient that improved with surgery showed elongated
brainstem on MRI.
-
Not clear if a tight filum can cause cerebellar tonsils to
herniate
Table 1: Selected Symptoms
and Signs of 318 Patients Undergoing Section of the Filum Terminale
| |
Children (%) |
Adults (%) |
| Total |
12 |
88 |
| Related to TH |
|
|
| Suboccipital Headache |
82 |
90 |
| Posterior Neck Pain |
78 |
81 |
| Dizziness |
60 |
67 |
| Nausea, Vomiting |
49 |
48 |
| Related to TCS |
|
|
| Low Back Pain |
77 |
90 |
| Leg Pain |
82 |
82 |
| Urinary Problems |
93 |
73 |
| Leg numbness, weakness |
70 |
72 |
| Muscular Atrophy |
19 |
25 |
| Bowel Problems |
64 |
68 |
| Pelvic Numbness |
38 |
69 |
Note: TH = tonsillar
herniation; TCS = tethered cord syndrome
Table 2: Surgical Ouctome (Section of the Filum, 318 Total)
| |
Children (%) |
Adults (%) |
| Resolved |
36 |
18 |
| Improved |
57 |
65 |
| Unchanged |
7 |
16 |
| Worse |
0 |
1 |
Source: Association of Chiari malformation type I and tethered
cord syndrome: preliminary results of sectioning filum terminale.
Milhorat TH, Bolognese PA, Nishikawa M, Francomano CA, McDonnell NB,
Roonprapunt C, Kula RW. Surg Neurol. 2009 Jul;72(1):20-35
Related C&S News Articles:
Duraplasty Prevents Retethering In Complex TCS Cases
Timing Important In Treating Tethered Cord
Surgical Outcomes For
Adult Tethered Cord Surgery
Controversy Surrounds Occult Tethered Cord
Syndrome |