|
Table of Contents cerebellar tonsils -
portion of the cerebellum located at the bottom, so named because of their
shape
cerebellum - part of
the brain located at the bottom of the skull, near the opening to the spinal
area; important for muscle control, movement, and balance
cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF) - clear liquid in the brain and spinal cord, acts
as a shock absorber
Chiari malformation -
condition where the cerebellar tonsils are displaced out of the skull area
into the spinal area, causing compression of brain tissue and disruption of
CSF flow
craniectomy - surgical
technique where part of the skull is removed
decompression surgery -
general term used for any of several surgical techniques employed to
create more space around a Chiari malformation and to relieve compression
diplopia - double
vision
dura - tough, outer
covering of the brain and spinal cord
duraplasty - surgical
technique where the dura is opened and expanded by sewing a patch into it
dysphagia - trouble
swallowing
dysarthria - slurred
speech
incontinence - loss of
bladder and/or bowel control
intradural exploration
- general term referring to a surgeon finding and removing any scarring or
obstructions to CSF flow that exist underneath the dura
laminectomy - surgical
technique where part of a vertebra is removed
magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) - diagnostic device which uses a strong magnetic field to create
images of the body's internal parts
posterior fossa -
depression on the inside of the back of the skull, near the base, where the
cerebellum is normally situated
scoliosis - abnormal
curvature of the spine
syringomyelia (SM)
- neurological condition where a fluid filled cyst forms in the spinal
cord
syrinx - fluid filled
cyst in the spinal cord
tonsillar herniation -
descent of the cerebellar tonsils into the spinal area; often measure in mm
|
Despite the fact that thousands of Chiari
decompressions are performed in the US each year, there continues to be
controversy surrounding the specific techniques involved in the procedure.
For example, the question of whether to open the dura - the tough outer
covering of the brain - remains a subject of intense debate. Those in
favor suggest that opening the dura is necessary to achieve an adequate
decompression and that scars and adhesions that exist under the dura must be
removed. Those against point out that opening the dura is the primary
cause of surgical complications and that removing bone is often sufficient,
especially for cases with Chiari only.
While each camp is likely to have it's strong advocates for
years to come, evidence is growing that a group of modified procedures -
lying somewhere in the middle - may provide adequate decompression in some cases. In an effort to reduce the
invasiveness of the surgery - especially for children - some surgeons have
begun to manipulate the dura without completely opening it and sewing a
patch in. One such technique involves scoring the dura with a number
of shallow incisions. Another technique which has had preliminary
success involves opening only the outer layer of the dura, but not cutting
all the way through.
To examine whether this type of dura splitting
technique is beneficial, Dr.'s Selden and Limonadi, at Doernbecher
Children's Hospital in Oregon, designed a study which compared clinical
outcomes, time in surgery, time in hospital, and costs incurred between a
group of children with Chiari who underwent dura splitting as part of their
surgery and a group of children with Chiari and syringomyelia who had a full
duraplasty as part of their surgery. They published their findings in
a November, 2004 supplement to the Journal of Neurosurgery.
Over a period of approximately two years, the doctors
operated on 24 children, 12 with Chiari only and 12 Chiari and
syringomyelia. The initial decompression was the same for both groups and
involved removing a piece of the skull and part of the top vertebra.
The group with syringomyelia also underwent a duraplasty, whereas the group
with Chiari only did not. In this group, the top layer of the dura was
split and the two sides were peeled back and sutured into place. This
exposed the softer, underlayer of the dura, which was not punctured or
opened in any way. Ultrasound was used during the procedure to ensure
adequate decompression of the tonsils.
In order to track the clinical outcome of each group,
the researchers carefully documented each child's neurological signs and
symptoms before and after surgery. A score was assigned for each of
the three primary signs and/or symptoms of each child: 2 = resolved; 1
= improved; 0 = unchanged; -1 = worse. The three numbers were then
averaged to produce single outcome score ranging from 2 (meaning all
symptoms resolved) to -1 (meaning very poor outcome with every symptom
worse).
Overall, the symptoms experienced by each group were
similar (see Table1), however the Chiari only group did suffer more from
headaches. Similarly, the syringomyelia group had instances of
scoliosis and incontinence which did not occur in the Chiari only group.
After computing the outcome scores for each group, the
scientists found virtually no difference between them (see Table 2).
The syringomyelia/duraplasty group had an average outcome score of 1.53,
while the Chiari/dura splitting group averaged 1.67. This difference
is not statistically significant. It should be noted, however, that
the average follow-up time was only 15 months after surgery, so this
represents a short-term outcome measure.
The doctors did find, however, a significant difference
between the groups in every other measure. The dura splitting group
spent less time in surgery, in the operating room, and in the hospital
overall. The costs incurred for the dura splitting group were also
lower. On average, the duraplasty group spent a total of 249 minutes
in the operating room and stayed in the hospital for 3.75 days. These
numbers dropped to only 166 minutes in the OR and 3 days in the hospital for
the dura splitting group. Similarly, total hospital charges for the
duraplasty group were over $9,700 on average, but only $7700 for the dura
splitting group.
Based on the good clinical results and the reduced time
and costs associated with the dura splitting, the authors believe there is
enough evidence to warrant a large, multi-center, randomized trial (meaning
patients would be randomly assigned to receive either dura splitting or
duraplasty) using children with Chiari only.
Despite it's strong results, this study does suffer
from several limitations which the authors readily acknowledge. First,
the two groups used for comparison were dissimilar. One group had
syringomyelia and one didn't. Ideally, each group would be the same.
Second, given the tendency for Chiari symptoms to come back, much longer
term follow-up would be requirde to conclusively say whether dura splitting
provides enough decompression.
The authors also stress that these results can not be
extended to adults or to people with syringomyelia (even children).
Despite it's limitations, the promise of a less invasive surgery for
children is good news for Chiari families everywhere.
--Rick Labuda
Back to Table of Contents |
Key Points
-
Whether to open the dura during
decompression surgery remains controversial
-
Recently there has been a trend
toward less invasive procedures, especially for Chiari only
-
Study compared a number of measures
between 12 Chiari children who underwent a dura splitting technique and 12
Chiari/syringomyelia children who underwent duraplasty
-
Short-term outcomes were equivalent,
but the dura splitting group had shorter times in the OR and hospital and
incurred less costs
Table 1
Summary of Selected Signs and Symptoms
| |
Group (%) |
| Symptom |
Duraplasty |
Dura Splitting |
| Headache |
50 |
92 |
| Extremity Weakness |
33 |
33 |
| Numbness |
33 |
25 |
| Dysphagia |
25 |
17 |
| Disarthria |
17 |
8 |
| Diplopia |
8 |
8 |
| Pain |
17 |
17 |
| Incontinence |
17 |
0 |
| Scoliosis Only |
8 |
0 |
Table 2
Summary of Outcome Measures
| |
Dura- plasty |
Dura Splitting |
Sig? |
| Clinical |
1.53 |
1.67 |
N |
| Op. Time (min) |
169 |
99 |
Y |
| Total OR Time (min) |
249 |
166 |
Y |
| LOS (days) |
3.75 |
3.00 |
Y |
| OR Charges ($) |
5538 |
3615 |
Y |
| Total Hosp Charges ($) |
9759 |
7705 |
Y |
Note: Sig? refers to
whether the difference between the two groups is statistically significant
and not likely due to chance.
Source: Limonadi FM, Selden NR.
Dura-splitting decompression of the craniocervical junction: reduced
operative time, hospital stay, and cost with equivalent early outcome.
J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101(2 Suppl):184-8.
Related C&S News Articles:
To Open or Not To Open The Dura; That Is The Question
Large Study
Examines Surgical Outcomes In Children
Using Ultrasound To
Make Surgery Patient Specific.
Can testing during surgery
help resolve the surgical debate? |